Chips' Fun House ~ View topic

I don't know man, back in my Quake days I could "fluidly trace" a player with the Machine Gun just like he did in the demo with the AR. After playing a game for so long against thousands of Human adversaries, you get fairly accurate at predicting Human movement. Especially when they're escape path is simply running around a corner and down a ramp (If I'm looking at the wrong AR let me know). His excuse for the jerkiness was playing with a touch pad, which I have also done. It does cause a jerkiness almost identical to whats seen in the video. Again, after playing for an extended period of time with a touch pad; you get real familiar with whre you need to move you finger on the pad to aim at the advancing enemy and don't evven notice the jerk as its natural for you.

I'm just saying that the Walling seems obvious, the Aimbotting not so much.

Forum Soldier Joined: 23 May 2006 Posts: 324

"I don't have an aimbot, it's a TrackBall!" lol

I'm just disappointed that Rebs still hasn't at least admitted at least the wallhack which is beyond clear. I'm glad he's not on the server if he won't even be honest about it.

Yes...by all means keep it civil. Yoda has come here to explain himself and explain the workings of the hack(s) as he understands them. I don't recall any of his words to be demeaning in any way...no reason anyone should be making this personal.

He gave a wealth of detail and information...for those that maybe have no idea how these things work, it's a good starting point for them to understand. Neutral

oh by no means was my response a personal attack, sorry if it was misunderstood as such. the information he stated was defintley good ground for hacks, i was only attacking his poor wordplay.

Please, you're skirting the real issue of whether you cheated or not and now you're attacking semantics as a viable defence. Please don't waste people's time by posting that sort of tripe, this is a serious issue and you're not treating it as such.

To me, when you start turning down that line of argument you lose all credibility, its like a last ditch defence when you know you're gone and there is nothing you can do to stop it.

Please Rebs, I enjoy playing with you, own up or shut up (Sorry if thats a bit harsh).

Forum Medic Joined: 17 Jul 2005 Posts: 118

To properly analyze whether a person in a demo is wallhacking, you need to be able to see what he would see. I'd recommend downloading X-Spectate. It's a tool that allows you to toggle wallhacks while viewing a demo and allows you to see things you wouldn't be able to see when viewing it normally.

Just make sure you don't have it running if you join a real server - it can get you VAC banned.

I havent chimed in yet as others have said what I was feeling. However Reb, while I liked playing with you and such, and could give a rats ass what you do/did, I will say this as to your train of thinking.
Understand this isnt a court of law, thus, there doesnt have to be a 100% concensus. I have not looked at any of the posted demos, nor will I, for as I said, the masses have spoken either for or against you, so my opinion doesnt mean squat.
What I do take to heart is your insistance that you feel everyone needs to agree 1 way or the other. That is not the case here, nor will it ever be.... here or anywhere else.
Why, I bet you couldnt get everyone here to agree that today is Sunday, let alone what they may or may not see in a demo.
As to what you did or didnt do, its obvious that some think you were doing things underhandedly........did you ever think to offer up your config files and such to better help your cause?

Forum Medic Joined: 17 Jul 2005 Posts: 118

rebel, your logic is absolutely absurd. First off, the general consensus here from the very start was that you were wallhacking, but not aimbotting. Nothing has changed. Secondly, I have no idea why you continue to argue about semantics. At risk of being somewhat morbid, it's like a lawyer arguing that there is no proof against a murder defendant because nobody actually saw the defendant shoot the victim .... even though there is DNA evidence putting him at the crime scene, he has gunpowder on his hands, the victim's blood on his clothes, no alibi and a Probable Cause.

If it makes you feel better, there is no proof, but there is overwhelming evidence that, IMO, makes you guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Happy?

guys u are misunderstnading me, or maybe im poor with english, but as im trying to say im not convincing anyone that i wasnt hacking, and im not saying that you all must agree as to the fact that iwas hacking, i said a majority was plenty for me to be banned, and i was banned. i have said i wont agree with your decisions and will hold my own by saying i wasnt hacking and will maintain this UNLESS you provide me with 100% certainty that i was hacking, which im sure you cant.

majority is plenty for me to be banned, and i was, that doesnt mean i must conceed defeat. there is sufficient evidence to get me banned, as you guys say, and i WAS banned. im ok with that .. what im not ok with is you few accusing me over certainly hacking , of a 100% chance i was. you cannot prove such a thing, and i will stick by that. enough to get me banned? ok. theres always room for human error, and what im saying is that in this case, that is so.

so let me repeat myself one more time.

i know i was "caught hacking" by you guys, and that there was a majority consensus that i was so i was fairly banned. what you cannot do is say i was defintley hacking. you had overwhelming evidence as jum puts it to say i was hacking, which is fine. but overwhelming is not complete, and until you get complete evidence. you cannot say i hacked for sure as so many of you have. by all means keep me banned, i dont expect otherwise, for you all do feel i hacked. but nevertheless that doesnt mean i neccisarily did.

Forum Soldier Joined: 07 Jul 2005 Posts: 353